☕ Psihopata, ki sta izvedla napad na novinarje satiričnega častnika Charlie Hebdo v Franciji

Provocirali..dregali v osje gnezdo.To se je pricakovalo.Islam in Alah ne ucita grdih stvari.Ampak mir in dobroto.Ti so pa totalni skrajnezi.Take skrajneze pa najdemo v vseh verah in narodnistih.Tak da ne vse metat v isti kos!

@ cvickarica - saj imas prav, veroizpoved bi morala biti nepomembna, in to povsod. Mogoce zaradi novega trenda na twitterju Je suis Ahmed ..

'He died defending the right to ridicule his faith': France unites behind #JeSuisAhmed on Twitter in tribute to Muslim officer slain by fanatics as he begged for his life
Shocking footage showed Mr Merabet being executed in the street
He was a 42-year-old bicycle patrolman, who also happened to be Muslim
Tributes have poured in for the 'heroic' officer killed in the line of duty
Under the rallying cry of 'I am Ahmed', thousands have shown solidarity
Some pointed out he died protecting those who poked fun at his religion

Today, #JeSuisAhmed began trending on Twitter as thousands expressed their admiration for his sacrifice while defending the right to freedom of speech.

The rallying cry is a play on words of 'Je Suis Charlie', the catchphrase spawned in the wake of the deadly massacre to show solidarity with those killed.

Mr Merabet, originally from Livry-Gargan in north eastern Paris, had been a fully-trained police officer for eight years.

To pa je seznam vseh umorjenih in slikca iz redakcije. Ne morem, da si ne bi mislila, kako je bilo fantasticno delovno okolje... Stephanie 'Charb' Charbonnier: Publication director Charb had been under protection since his magazine controversially reprinted cartoons of Mohammed in 2006. He was a longtime supporter of the Parti Communiste, and later, the left-wing Front de Gauche. Bernard ‘Tignous’ Verlhac: Tignous, 57, was a regular contributor to Charlie Hebdo. His friends yesterday paid tribute to Tignous' 'bon vivant' spirit, and recalled his own words: 'There are two things I really know how to do: friendship and drawing. Georges Wolinski: The cartooning doyen, aged 80, was one of the founding members of the Hara-Kiri magazine, a forerunner to Charlie Hebdo, in the 1960s. He believed 'humour is the shortest route from one man to another'. Jean Cabut: Killed a week shy of his 77th birthday, Cabut has been widely remembered as a bespectacled giant of the French cartooning world. Cabut's work was first published at the age of 16. Bernard Maris: An economist and contributor who was in the office's at the time of the massacre. Also an author, born in Toulouse in 1946, Maris was best known to Charlie readers as "Uncle Bernard". He wrote for Marianne, Le Figaro Magazine, Le Monde and L'Obs and was a regular on France Inter. Elsa Cayat: The psychiatrist and psychoanalyst was the only woman killed in the massacre. She wrote a twice-monthly column for Charlie Hebdo entitled 'Charlie Divan' - 'Couch' - and published essays on relations between men and women and sexuality. The only woman killed in the attack. Michel Renaud: Mr Renaud was not a staff member but was guest editing an upcoming edition of the magazine. He had gone to visit Charlie Hebdo's offices with another member of his organisation, Gerard Gaillard, who survived the gunfire. According to France Bleu, the pair had come to visit Jean Cabut, who was a guest of honour at last year's event. Frederic Boisseau: Mr Boisseau had worked for French catering and site facilities company Sodexo for 15 years. He was reportedly a 42-year-old father-of two. Mustapha Ourrad: One of the magazine's copy editors. Ahmed Merabet: The 42-year-old Muslim police officer executed by the militants while begging for his life. Franck Brinsolaro: The second police officer killed, he was a married father-of-two tasked with protecting the magazine editor, Mr Charbonnier http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/08/24820ECF00000578-2901681-Many_of_the_journalists_and_staff_members_killed_in_yesterday_s_-a-22_1420715779935.jpg .

Ne nakladaj! Kdaj je kak budist koga ubil zaradi svoje vere?

A provocirali da so? Po tvoji idiotski logiki ima pravico vsakdo, iz katerega se karikaturisti norčujejo, pobijat?

Ne vem, no. Jaz vem za eno familijo, kjer je imel moz dve zeni in z drugo zeno in starejsim sinom so ubili prvo zeno in hcere moza in druge zene, ker sta se oblacili zahodnjasko in je ena od deklet imela fanta in sta hceri tako onecastili svojo druzino.

Kolikor vem, muslimanska vera se zdalec ne uci le miru in dobrote.


Kolikokrat so si satiriki ze privoscili druge vere, pa se jim zato nihce ni masceval z umorom.

Ne vem, no. Jaz vem za eno familijo, kjer je imel moz dve zeni in z drugo zeno in starejsim sinom so ubili prvo zeno in hcere moza in druge zene, ker sta se oblacili zahodnjasko in je ena od deklet imela fanta in sta hceri tako onecastili svojo druzino.

Kolikor vem, muslimanska vera se zdalec ne uci le miru in dobrote.


Kolikokrat so si satiriki ze privoscili druge vere, pa se jim zato nihce ni masceval z umorom.

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2015/1/8/1420744677920/Drancy-imam-011.jpg The imam of the Drancy mosque in Paris leaves flowers and prays near the Charlie Hebdo offices. Photograph: Marc Piasecki/Getty Images http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/08/france-bloody-intolerant-history-bloodshed-muslims Charlie Hebdo: Don`t blame this bloodshed on the France`s Muslims

Fiddlesticks ni vzrok šale na račun vere in vernikov, norčevanje je povod za tragedijo. Vzroki tičijo globje in so že dolgo znani.

Po vseh analizah okroglih in oglatih mizah, časopisnih in televiziskih komentarjih sem videla in prebrala samo dva, ki sta pomislila na prave vzroke krvavega dogodka v Parizu. Drugo je samo brezumno blebetanje.

Zelo zelo me skrbi odnos odgovornih (ali se obnašajo odgovorno) do perečih svetovnih in ob enem naših problemov.

Bojim se, da ne.

Zahod gradi svet samo za izbrance. Prav tem izbrancem so se udinjali naši trepeleti, cerarji, pahorji, židani, lukšiči, janše, bratuškvi, moederdorferji, in mnogi drugi. Ljudsvo, zaradi katerih so, pa so odpisali. Ljudstvo naj crkne.

V pParizu se je zbralo poleg politične kamarile Europe še miljon ljudi poslušajte "proti terorizmu v svetu. Mobilizirali so 600.000 vojakov za varovanje Francije. Ne zavedajo se, da Francije ali Europe ne morejo obvarovati pred terorizmom, ki ga sami sejemo po vseh nerazvitih državah v Afriki, Aziji, južni in sredni Ameriki. Tam je ključ za rešitev problema terorizma.

Prenehajmo podpirati terorizem v marginalnih državah sveta.

To bo služila vojaška industrija zdaj...

JA IN MI BEDAKI BOMO VSO TO KRVAVO ZABAVO BOGATAŠEV PLAČALI.

ALA SMO PAMETNI. UPRIMO SE TEM NEUMNOSTIM IN NESMISLOM.

Zanimivo vprašanje v Maldini. SE VAM ZDI DA RAZUMETE DOGAJANJE V FRANCIJI ????

Kaj pravite VI ????

Preberite še tole, morda boste začeli razmišljati.

Marcel Štefančič, jr. je o tem filmu zapisal: »Odvetnik terorja je doku o Jacquesu Vergèsu, razvpitem francoskem odvetniku, ki so ga nekoč vprašali, če bi na sodišču zagovarjal tudi Adolfa Hitlerja. Odvrnil je: “Zagovarjal bi celo Georgea Busha!” Zagovarjal je mnoge, ki si po mnenju ljudstva obrambe niso zaslužili, recimo nacističnega zločinca Klausa Barbieja, terorista “Carlosa”, Tariqa Aziza, člane frakcije “Kekal”, ki naj bi leta 1995 razstrelili pariški metro, pa upornike iz Tretjega sveta, afriške separatiste, radikalne komuniste, militantne muslimane, neonaciste, nemške teroriste, zanikovalce nacističnega Holokavsta in armenske ugrabitelje ter francoske intelektualce, ki so nasprotovali alžirski vojni, in člane alžirskega odporniškega gibanja, ki so se v petdesetih in šestdesetih borili proti francoski kolonialni okupaciji. In prav tu je ključ: Jacques Vergès je alergičen na kolonializem, imperializem in rasizem. Vse tiste “pošasti”, vse tiste kontroverzne, politične, težke, neubranljive, vnaprej izgubljene primere je izbiral zato, da bi lahko napadel državo, Francijo, kolonializem, imperializem – da bi lahko torej na dan potegnil vse vojne, rasne in kolonialistične zločine, ki jih je Francija zamolčala. Če so nacisti počeli to, kar so v Alžiriji in Indokini počeli Francozi, zakaj so potem nacisti krivi, Francozi pa ne? Če je Nemčija fasala Nürnberg, zakaj ga ni potem fasala tudi Francija? Vergès je zato vsako sojenje prelevil v Nürnberg – v pompozno, pikantno, aktivistično, “teroristično” sojenje Franciji, Zahodu, kolonializmu in imperializmu. Vergès ni toliko “odvetnik terorja” kot hudičev advokat – slaba vest zahodnih dvojnih standardov. Morala zahodne morale.«

Je se kar nekaj drzav in njihovih voditeljev, ki bi si zasluzili tako sojenje. Jaz se ob takih dogodkih vedno spomnem na Poldeta, nekdanjega belgijskega kralja. Ampak junaki njegove sorte imajo imuniteto, potomci pa kraljevine.

Bistra si mi ti Fiddlesticks .