Jp, Darmun, drži, tud če nisem bral teh črev. ☝️😁
Še več zna bit:
Nekdanji Nasin znanstvenik je ponudil odgovor. Nezemljani se nam morda ne javljajo zato, ker verjetno živijo na dnu zamrznjenega oceana na vodnem planetu.
Tako tako, tako ja. 😁
Še več zna bit:
Nekdanji Nasin znanstvenik je ponudil odgovor. Nezemljani se nam morda ne javljajo zato, ker verjetno živijo na dnu zamrznjenega oceana na vodnem planetu.
Tako tako, tako ja. 😁
-1
Zanimivo in realno ter bolj poučno bi bilo opisati, kaj se zgodi s človekom, ko mu v nanosekundi šine vsa kri iz zgornje v spodnjo glavo ob pogledu na mini krilce.
0
Kdove, ce si je ta mladenic ogledal, kako so njegovi predniki prisli iz Evrope v Anglijo po koncu ledene dobe. Doggerland bi bil moj predlog. Morska gladina se dviga vse od konca ledene dobe.
-1
@Yara Nimam razloga za zadrego. 😁 Zgolj nasmejal sem se, medtem ko gledam serijo.😁
0
"Fizika in astronomija sta delno kontaminirani" ... 😆 😆 😛 Kontaminirana je samo človeška neumnost.
0
@Viharni jezdec katero serijo gledaš? Rabim kak namig, ker je že dolgo, kar sem jih gledala.
0
@Yara "Mesto pod temnim soncem" na netflixu. Ravno začel sem in sem sred prve epizode.
0
Ajh... Netlixa pa nimam.. Morda mi ga Božiček prinese, pa ne da si ga zares želim. TV imamo pri nas bolj kot ne za okras pa uno,k v zadregi ne veš, kej počet, pa 3x prah pobrišeš z ekrana z omelom. Sem pa tud jst ene 2 mesca nazaj na HBO eno dansko kriminalno serijo gledala, pa me je tako pritegnila, da sem vseh 5 sezon po 6 delov čez vikend pogledala.
2
Sem vesela, da nekateri mentalno napredujejo hitreje kot jaz v vrsti na blagajni v Intersparu.
3
Vse tole je popolna neumnost kot bi vam jaz, upravnik vinske kleti razlagal da, če ga spijem premalo, bodo sodi bolj polni, če pa spijem preveč, bodo pa izsušeni. Preprosta vinska logika!
0
Odlična tema. Res izjemna vprašanja, veliko tega sem že sama slišala in vedela ampak avtor zastavil si toliko zelo pomembnih izhodisc in vprašanj, da vse to samo potrjuje na zlagano in prikrito zgodovino. Ogromno, najbolj pomembne stvari so nam prikrili. Postavlja se vprašanje KDO in ZAKAJ. Hvala za to temo. Če imaš še kaj podobnega, bom z veseljem prebrala.
3
Pozabila sem dopisati se, da sem v enem dokumentarcu gledala, kako del Noetove barke štrli ven iz gore Ararat v Turčiji.
Glede Darwinovih teorij o evoluciji človeka je pa veliko zgrešenega. Sicer pa takrat niso še imeli toliko znanja, ker so šele odkrivali svet in nastanek človeštva.
Glede Darwinovih teorij o evoluciji človeka je pa veliko zgrešenega. Sicer pa takrat niso še imeli toliko znanja, ker so šele odkrivali svet in nastanek človeštva.
-1
Nešteto posmehov nasprotnikov pa niti enega argumenta na sto dejstev, ki si jih lahko vsak prebere na wikipediji, časopisnih članikih, knjigah svetovno priznanih in spoštovanih avtorjev itd. Samo povezati moraš te zadeve in dobiš to kar v omenjenih verskih knjigah že ves čas piše že stoletja, da ne rečem tisočletja.
Smeh ni argument, smeh je dokaz da nimate pojma.
Lep primer kako se gremo znanost. Njihov evolucinistični posmeh je znanost, kreacinistični znanstveniki pa so z omenjanjem najdb, meritev zgolj neznanstveni tepci. Koliko njihovih lažnih najdb so bili dokazano ponaredki, pa vseeno so vse te najdbe ostale v učbenikih za študente. Cele znanosti temeljijo na narobe interpretiranih poskusih na vinskih mušicah a dobesedno mižijo pri velikih najdbah in poskusih.
Za začetek me zanima kje so vsa okostja vmesnih členov živali? Krokodil je bil vedno najden kot krokodil, miš kot miš itd. Kje so ponovitve poskusa kako iz nežive materije dobiti živo materijo? Kako iz skale dobimo človeka in katera ustvarjalna sila napiše vsa navodila za novo živo bitje?
Ker pa vrhove cerkev obvladujejo satanisti, ne bodo kreacinističnim znanstvenikom pomagali niti z 1 evrov, kaj šele da bi pridigali to kar piše njihova sveta knjiga. Izdajalci.
Smeh ni argument, smeh je dokaz da nimate pojma.
Lep primer kako se gremo znanost. Njihov evolucinistični posmeh je znanost, kreacinistični znanstveniki pa so z omenjanjem najdb, meritev zgolj neznanstveni tepci. Koliko njihovih lažnih najdb so bili dokazano ponaredki, pa vseeno so vse te najdbe ostale v učbenikih za študente. Cele znanosti temeljijo na narobe interpretiranih poskusih na vinskih mušicah a dobesedno mižijo pri velikih najdbah in poskusih.
Za začetek me zanima kje so vsa okostja vmesnih členov živali? Krokodil je bil vedno najden kot krokodil, miš kot miš itd. Kje so ponovitve poskusa kako iz nežive materije dobiti živo materijo? Kako iz skale dobimo človeka in katera ustvarjalna sila napiše vsa navodila za novo živo bitje?
Ker pa vrhove cerkev obvladujejo satanisti, ne bodo kreacinističnim znanstvenikom pomagali niti z 1 evrov, kaj šele da bi pridigali to kar piše njihova sveta knjiga. Izdajalci.
1
Pa o ljudeh velikanih je pisal Darko na SČ, prilepil ogromno člankov in posnetkov, pa so se norca delali do neslutenih razsežnostih in ga brutalno žalili.Predvsem Matias, Milan viharc in njegova kompanija.
Kje so skrita okostja velikanov ljudi, Darko je objavil tudi cerkvene freske o NLP predmetih Itd. Mene pa vseeno zanimajo črvine. Nekdo mi je enkrat razložil na SČ, da bi se materije človeške celice mogle povsem razgraditi in na drugi strani ponovno sestaviti v prvotno obliko nazaj oziroma o teleportaciji pa še ni dokazov. Kako pa so to vedeli ameriški režiserji in vključili ravno te prizore v film? Torej jim je nekdo moral to povedati, prikazati ...
Kje so skrita okostja velikanov ljudi, Darko je objavil tudi cerkvene freske o NLP predmetih Itd. Mene pa vseeno zanimajo črvine. Nekdo mi je enkrat razložil na SČ, da bi se materije človeške celice mogle povsem razgraditi in na drugi strani ponovno sestaviti v prvotno obliko nazaj oziroma o teleportaciji pa še ni dokazov. Kako pa so to vedeli ameriški režiserji in vključili ravno te prizore v film? Torej jim je nekdo moral to povedati, prikazati ...
0
Vau, že po sliki se vidi, da gre za "znanstvenika", še brki so mu začeli poganjati od znanja iz teorij zarot. 😆
Darmund, kakšne ocene si imel iz naravoslovnih predmetov? Težko izborjene dvojke, pa še te nezaslužene. 🙂
Intelektualna lenoba neštudioznih oseb, ko nekdo samo nekaj povzema brez znanstvenih dokazov, ker mu je fajn in ga privlači kontraverzno senzacionalistično, kar se prodaja s strani influencerjev ala Joe Rogan, čeprav nima(jo) pojma o pojmu, nobenih osnov, je tema za cirkusante, ki iščejo 2 minuti slave z lahkih zaslužkom, katerih žrtve so naivneži, ki se jim lahko ta neznanstveni krš naprej prodaja. 😉
The Great Big Pseudoarcheology Debunk (Graham Hancock, Dan Richards, Jimmy Corsetti) -
Professor Dave Explains
Darmund, kakšne ocene si imel iz naravoslovnih predmetov? Težko izborjene dvojke, pa še te nezaslužene. 🙂
Intelektualna lenoba neštudioznih oseb, ko nekdo samo nekaj povzema brez znanstvenih dokazov, ker mu je fajn in ga privlači kontraverzno senzacionalistično, kar se prodaja s strani influencerjev ala Joe Rogan, čeprav nima(jo) pojma o pojmu, nobenih osnov, je tema za cirkusante, ki iščejo 2 minuti slave z lahkih zaslužkom, katerih žrtve so naivneži, ki se jim lahko ta neznanstveni krš naprej prodaja. 😉
The Great Big Pseudoarcheology Debunk (Graham Hancock, Dan Richards, Jimmy Corsetti) -
Professor Dave Explains
0
@Yara
Ajh... Netlixa pa nimam.. Morda mi ga Božiček prinese, pa ne da si ga zares želim. TV imamo pri nas bolj kot ne za okras pa uno,k v zadregi ne veš, kej počet, pa 3x prah pobrišeš z ekrana z omelom. Sem pa tud jst ene 2 mesca nazaj na HBO eno dansko kriminalno serijo gledala, pa me je tako pritegnila, da sem vseh 5 sezon po 6 delov čez vikend pogledala.
Netflixa ne rabiš. 🙂
Unraveling the mystery of the Younger Dryas: Ice Age, Megafauna, and Human Civilization
YOUTUBE: watch?v=doEKVBuOIRc&t=2135s
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/01/netflix-ancient-apocalypse-canceled Netflix’s Ancient Apocalypse scraps US filming plans after outcry from Native American groups
ontroversial British writer Graham Hancock has abandoned plans to film a new season of his hit Netflix show Ancient Apocalypse in the US following an outcry from Indigenous groups over his depiction of their history and culture.
Hancock is a former journalist who has been criticized by experts for his promotion of fringe beliefs in the show which presents theories about an advanced lost civilization active during the last ice age.
Producers on the show, which reportedly reached Netflix’s top 10 status in 31 countries, had applied for permits to film new episodes at the Grand Canyon national park in Arizona and the Chaco Canyon national historical park in New Mexico, the Guardian has learned, despite strong objections from local tribal leaders.
An application to film at Grand Canyon was lodged by ITN Productions, makers of Ancient Apocalypse, in February, with a further permit for Chaco Canyon then granted, a National Parks Service (NPS) spokesperson confirmed. However, ITN told the Guardian that neither of the permits will now be taken up, with the show instead looking to film at locations outside the US. The company declined to specify a reason for this move.
According to information obtained by the Guardian through a Freedom of Information Act request, ITN did do some filming for four days in Chaco Canyon in January.
The crew planned to return to the park for more filming in March, but an email to Chaco staff states they cancelled their trip at the last minute due to “some delays with permissions for some other sites we were hoping to film in”.
The description for the Secrets of the Ancients program listed on the Chaco filming permit application said the program would explore “one of archaeology’s biggest mysteries: the peopling of the Americas”.
The Grand Canyon in Arizona, where ITN applied for a permit to film.
View image in fullscreen
The Grand Canyon in Arizona, where ITN applied for a permit to film. Photograph: Rhona Wise/AFP/Getty Images
It went on to state: “We’ll uncover the latest findings about the earliest inhabitants of the Americas and reveal remarkable scientific knowledge that’s been handed down for generations. Where did humans settle first in the Americas, and what do we know about them?”
Hancock, who is not an archeologist, has attracted the ire of those in the profession, as well as Native groups, for pushing a theory that an advanced ice age society, responsible for modern understandings of maths, architecture and agriculture, was wiped out by floods triggered by comet strikes nearly 12,000 years ago.
Evidence of this is found at ancient sites around the world, Hancock claims, with the writer visiting such places in countries including Turkey, Mexico and Indonesia in the first season of the Netflix show, aired in 2022. During the show, which Netflix promoted with the tagline “What if everything we know about prehistoric humans is wrong?”, Hancock railed against “mainstream archaeology” for not accepting his theories.
“[Hancock] presents his theories as being superior to what the first inhabitants of the area say about their own history,” said Stewart Koyiyumptewa, tribal historic preservation officer for the Hopi Nation.
The Hopi people have lived in or near the Grand Canyon for at least 2,000 years and claim a sacred site inside the canyon as their place of emergence. They also have strong ties to Chaco Canyon.
A Grand Canyon national park staff member who is Native American also pushed back against issuing a permit to ITN.
“This is embarrassing and a discredit to our agency when we have been working hard to respect Indigenous people and right many historical wrongs,” wrote the staff member in an email to Grand Canyon park management. “This is just degrading.”
A Hopi dancer in regalia at sunset.
View image in fullscreen
A Hopi dance at Papago Park in Arizona. The Hopi people have lived in the region for thousands of years. Photograph: Riccardo Lombardo/Reda&Co/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
According to a memo sent last March by a Grand Canyon national park staff member to leaders of the 11 Indigenous tribes affiliated with the park, Grand Canyon senior management sought to deny ITN permission to film in the natural wonder. “However, upon review at the Washington level, it was determined that NPS cannot deny this permit,” stated the memo, which was seen by the Guardian.
Hancock’s show is no stranger to such controversy. Scholars of Indo-Pacific history and Indigenous leaders in Micronesia objected to Hancock’s portrayal of archaeological sites in Indonesia and the Federated States of Micronesia in season one of Ancient Apocalypse.
According to Hancock, the ancient pyramid Gunung Padang in Indonesia and the ruins of Nan Madol in Micronesia were both built by an “advanced civilization” more than 20,000 years ago during the last ice age. However, present-day Pohnpeians say their oral histories passed down through generations describe the city of Nan Madol as being built by their ancestors beginning around 1,000 years ago – a timeline supported by historians and archaeologists.
Professor Patrick Nunn, who specializes in researching Pacific geography and archaeology at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia, told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that Hancock’s theories about who built Nan Madol strip Indigenous peoples of their rich histories and can be traced to “racist philosophies” and “white supremacist” ideologies of the 19th century.
In a May 2000 essay published on his website, Hancock writes: “I have consistently argued that the Americas were inhabited in prehistoric times by a variety of ethnic groups – Negroid, Caucasoid and Mongoloid … Such ideas have caused deep offense to some American Indians, who have long claimed to be the only ‘native’ Americans.”
He goes on to describe various prehistoric artifacts that he says prove the presence of Caucasians and Africans before Columbus landed on the continent in 1492. This includes his research into the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl, who he says was described by the Aztecs as “tall, white-skinned and red bearded – sometimes blue eyed as well”.
In addition to defying Indigenous histories and more than a century of established archaeological research in North America, Hancock’s theories are especially damaging because they fuel long-held racist beliefs that seek to erase the violence of colonization and slavery upon which the United States was founded, say Hancock’s detractors.
When Koyiyumptewa learned last March that the National Park Service was going to allow ITN to film in Grand Canyon, he sent an email, seen by the Guardian, that was addressed to Grand Canyon staff, ITN and Netflix stating he was “extremely disappointed” with the National Park Service’s decision.
The Little Colorado River, fed by monsoon rains that occur many miles away, flows through a barren landscape.
‘A scam all around’: Navajo Nation groups oppose hydropower projects
Read more
“That kind of decision is supposed to involve consultation with tribes,” Koyiyumptewa told the Guardian. “And it’s not just Hopi that objected. Numerous tribes were against allowing that permit because it brings negative consequences to us. But we were not consulted before the decision was made.”
Established archeologists have called on Netflix to label the show as science fiction, accusing Hancock of damaging their profession and of exhibiting racist attitudes towards Indigenous peoples.
“After more than a century of professional archaeological investigations, we find no archaeological evidence to support the existence of an ‘advanced, global ice age civilization’ of the kind Hancock suggests,” a letter sent by the Society for American Archaeology, after the airing of the Netflix show, states.
The letter adds that the claims in the show are “preposterous” and that “Hancock’s narrative emboldens extreme voices that misrepresent archaeological knowledge in order to spread false historical narratives that are overtly misogynistic, chauvinistic, racist and antisemitic.”
ITN did not respond to questions about the criticisms of the show. Hancock has previously defended his work, denying that he has sought to spread disinformation or fuel racist reimaginings of different cultures.
“That archaeologists have not found material evidence that would convince them of the existence of a lost civilization of the ice age is not by any means compelling evidence that no such civilization could have existed,” Hancock said in response to the Society for American Archaeology’s letter.
Hancock, previously a journalist at the Economist, wrote several books on international aid before switching focus to human prehistory. He has written more than a dozen books that embrace historical and archaeological themes. His son, Sean Hancock, works at Netflix as a senior manager of unscripted originals.
Ajh... Netlixa pa nimam.. Morda mi ga Božiček prinese, pa ne da si ga zares želim. TV imamo pri nas bolj kot ne za okras pa uno,k v zadregi ne veš, kej počet, pa 3x prah pobrišeš z ekrana z omelom. Sem pa tud jst ene 2 mesca nazaj na HBO eno dansko kriminalno serijo gledala, pa me je tako pritegnila, da sem vseh 5 sezon po 6 delov čez vikend pogledala.
Netflixa ne rabiš. 🙂
Unraveling the mystery of the Younger Dryas: Ice Age, Megafauna, and Human Civilization
YOUTUBE: watch?v=doEKVBuOIRc&t=2135s
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/01/netflix-ancient-apocalypse-canceled Netflix’s Ancient Apocalypse scraps US filming plans after outcry from Native American groups
ontroversial British writer Graham Hancock has abandoned plans to film a new season of his hit Netflix show Ancient Apocalypse in the US following an outcry from Indigenous groups over his depiction of their history and culture.
Hancock is a former journalist who has been criticized by experts for his promotion of fringe beliefs in the show which presents theories about an advanced lost civilization active during the last ice age.
Producers on the show, which reportedly reached Netflix’s top 10 status in 31 countries, had applied for permits to film new episodes at the Grand Canyon national park in Arizona and the Chaco Canyon national historical park in New Mexico, the Guardian has learned, despite strong objections from local tribal leaders.
An application to film at Grand Canyon was lodged by ITN Productions, makers of Ancient Apocalypse, in February, with a further permit for Chaco Canyon then granted, a National Parks Service (NPS) spokesperson confirmed. However, ITN told the Guardian that neither of the permits will now be taken up, with the show instead looking to film at locations outside the US. The company declined to specify a reason for this move.
According to information obtained by the Guardian through a Freedom of Information Act request, ITN did do some filming for four days in Chaco Canyon in January.
The crew planned to return to the park for more filming in March, but an email to Chaco staff states they cancelled their trip at the last minute due to “some delays with permissions for some other sites we were hoping to film in”.
The description for the Secrets of the Ancients program listed on the Chaco filming permit application said the program would explore “one of archaeology’s biggest mysteries: the peopling of the Americas”.
The Grand Canyon in Arizona, where ITN applied for a permit to film.
View image in fullscreen
The Grand Canyon in Arizona, where ITN applied for a permit to film. Photograph: Rhona Wise/AFP/Getty Images
It went on to state: “We’ll uncover the latest findings about the earliest inhabitants of the Americas and reveal remarkable scientific knowledge that’s been handed down for generations. Where did humans settle first in the Americas, and what do we know about them?”
Hancock, who is not an archeologist, has attracted the ire of those in the profession, as well as Native groups, for pushing a theory that an advanced ice age society, responsible for modern understandings of maths, architecture and agriculture, was wiped out by floods triggered by comet strikes nearly 12,000 years ago.
Evidence of this is found at ancient sites around the world, Hancock claims, with the writer visiting such places in countries including Turkey, Mexico and Indonesia in the first season of the Netflix show, aired in 2022. During the show, which Netflix promoted with the tagline “What if everything we know about prehistoric humans is wrong?”, Hancock railed against “mainstream archaeology” for not accepting his theories.
“[Hancock] presents his theories as being superior to what the first inhabitants of the area say about their own history,” said Stewart Koyiyumptewa, tribal historic preservation officer for the Hopi Nation.
The Hopi people have lived in or near the Grand Canyon for at least 2,000 years and claim a sacred site inside the canyon as their place of emergence. They also have strong ties to Chaco Canyon.
A Grand Canyon national park staff member who is Native American also pushed back against issuing a permit to ITN.
“This is embarrassing and a discredit to our agency when we have been working hard to respect Indigenous people and right many historical wrongs,” wrote the staff member in an email to Grand Canyon park management. “This is just degrading.”
A Hopi dancer in regalia at sunset.
View image in fullscreen
A Hopi dance at Papago Park in Arizona. The Hopi people have lived in the region for thousands of years. Photograph: Riccardo Lombardo/Reda&Co/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
According to a memo sent last March by a Grand Canyon national park staff member to leaders of the 11 Indigenous tribes affiliated with the park, Grand Canyon senior management sought to deny ITN permission to film in the natural wonder. “However, upon review at the Washington level, it was determined that NPS cannot deny this permit,” stated the memo, which was seen by the Guardian.
Hancock’s show is no stranger to such controversy. Scholars of Indo-Pacific history and Indigenous leaders in Micronesia objected to Hancock’s portrayal of archaeological sites in Indonesia and the Federated States of Micronesia in season one of Ancient Apocalypse.
According to Hancock, the ancient pyramid Gunung Padang in Indonesia and the ruins of Nan Madol in Micronesia were both built by an “advanced civilization” more than 20,000 years ago during the last ice age. However, present-day Pohnpeians say their oral histories passed down through generations describe the city of Nan Madol as being built by their ancestors beginning around 1,000 years ago – a timeline supported by historians and archaeologists.
Professor Patrick Nunn, who specializes in researching Pacific geography and archaeology at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia, told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that Hancock’s theories about who built Nan Madol strip Indigenous peoples of their rich histories and can be traced to “racist philosophies” and “white supremacist” ideologies of the 19th century.
In a May 2000 essay published on his website, Hancock writes: “I have consistently argued that the Americas were inhabited in prehistoric times by a variety of ethnic groups – Negroid, Caucasoid and Mongoloid … Such ideas have caused deep offense to some American Indians, who have long claimed to be the only ‘native’ Americans.”
He goes on to describe various prehistoric artifacts that he says prove the presence of Caucasians and Africans before Columbus landed on the continent in 1492. This includes his research into the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl, who he says was described by the Aztecs as “tall, white-skinned and red bearded – sometimes blue eyed as well”.
In addition to defying Indigenous histories and more than a century of established archaeological research in North America, Hancock’s theories are especially damaging because they fuel long-held racist beliefs that seek to erase the violence of colonization and slavery upon which the United States was founded, say Hancock’s detractors.
When Koyiyumptewa learned last March that the National Park Service was going to allow ITN to film in Grand Canyon, he sent an email, seen by the Guardian, that was addressed to Grand Canyon staff, ITN and Netflix stating he was “extremely disappointed” with the National Park Service’s decision.
The Little Colorado River, fed by monsoon rains that occur many miles away, flows through a barren landscape.
‘A scam all around’: Navajo Nation groups oppose hydropower projects
Read more
“That kind of decision is supposed to involve consultation with tribes,” Koyiyumptewa told the Guardian. “And it’s not just Hopi that objected. Numerous tribes were against allowing that permit because it brings negative consequences to us. But we were not consulted before the decision was made.”
Established archeologists have called on Netflix to label the show as science fiction, accusing Hancock of damaging their profession and of exhibiting racist attitudes towards Indigenous peoples.
“After more than a century of professional archaeological investigations, we find no archaeological evidence to support the existence of an ‘advanced, global ice age civilization’ of the kind Hancock suggests,” a letter sent by the Society for American Archaeology, after the airing of the Netflix show, states.
The letter adds that the claims in the show are “preposterous” and that “Hancock’s narrative emboldens extreme voices that misrepresent archaeological knowledge in order to spread false historical narratives that are overtly misogynistic, chauvinistic, racist and antisemitic.”
ITN did not respond to questions about the criticisms of the show. Hancock has previously defended his work, denying that he has sought to spread disinformation or fuel racist reimaginings of different cultures.
“That archaeologists have not found material evidence that would convince them of the existence of a lost civilization of the ice age is not by any means compelling evidence that no such civilization could have existed,” Hancock said in response to the Society for American Archaeology’s letter.
Hancock, previously a journalist at the Economist, wrote several books on international aid before switching focus to human prehistory. He has written more than a dozen books that embrace historical and archaeological themes. His son, Sean Hancock, works at Netflix as a senior manager of unscripted originals.
1
@Viharni jezdec
........................
Nekdanji Nasin znanstvenik je ponudil odgovor. Nezemljani se nam morda ne javljajo zato, ker verjetno živijo na dnu zamrznjenega oceana na vodnem planetu.
......................
Glede na moje poznavanje astronomije, je to popolnoma mogoče.
........................
Nekdanji Nasin znanstvenik je ponudil odgovor. Nezemljani se nam morda ne javljajo zato, ker verjetno živijo na dnu zamrznjenega oceana na vodnem planetu.
......................
Glede na moje poznavanje astronomije, je to popolnoma mogoče.
0
Sem si vzela čas in še enkrat prebrala uvodni zapis. Avtor omenjaš Ljubljansko kotlino in prod. Res je, a Ljubljansko barje je bilo vedno močvirnato, tu je še reka Ljubljanica, Sava ... Morda so reke naraščale ob deževjih ... Se pa strinjam da je na svetu veliko dokazov o vesoljnem potopu.
0
Jehovke so že pred 50 leti šle s čolni na Šmartno goro...
A so čolni še gor?
🫣
A so čolni še gor?
🫣
1
@Planika
Sem si vzela čas in še enkrat prebrala uvodni zapis. Avtor omenjaš Ljubljansko kotlino in prod. Res je, a Ljubljansko barje je bilo vedno močvirnato, tu je še reka Ljubljanica, Sava ... Morda so reke naraščale ob deževjih ... Se pa strinjam da je na svetu veliko dokazov o vesoljnem potopu.
V geologiji in arheologiji je vedno sklic na dokaze, ki v tem primeru ne podpirajo te teorije o naprednih civilizacijah, ki bi šle pod vodo. Sicer pa, čemu bi veroval v nekaj, za kar ni dokazov, ker potem sestopiš iz področja znanosti na področje vere, religije, mitologije. In seveda večina mitologij podpira vesoljni potop, pa ne samo to, tudi velikane in še polno drugih pravljičnih bitij, v katere verjameta z Darwinom. 🙂
Joe Rogan Experience #2136 - Graham Hancock & Flint Dibble
Sem si vzela čas in še enkrat prebrala uvodni zapis. Avtor omenjaš Ljubljansko kotlino in prod. Res je, a Ljubljansko barje je bilo vedno močvirnato, tu je še reka Ljubljanica, Sava ... Morda so reke naraščale ob deževjih ... Se pa strinjam da je na svetu veliko dokazov o vesoljnem potopu.
V geologiji in arheologiji je vedno sklic na dokaze, ki v tem primeru ne podpirajo te teorije o naprednih civilizacijah, ki bi šle pod vodo. Sicer pa, čemu bi veroval v nekaj, za kar ni dokazov, ker potem sestopiš iz področja znanosti na področje vere, religije, mitologije. In seveda večina mitologij podpira vesoljni potop, pa ne samo to, tudi velikane in še polno drugih pravljičnih bitij, v katere verjameta z Darwinom. 🙂
Joe Rogan Experience #2136 - Graham Hancock & Flint Dibble
0
Matias, dokazi so, a skrbno skriti ali uničeni. Zakaj so prikrivali, pa sem opisala v moji temi o potovanju skozi čas.
0
Saj. Jaz imam kar dober čoln in bi ga prodal Đarmunu in grenivki in si kupil novega, sam kaj ko nimata dnara. ☝️
-1
@Planika
Matias, dokazi so, a skrbno skriti ali uničeni. Zakaj so prikrivali, pa sem opisala v moji temi o potovanju skozi čas.
Grenivka, si gledala 4-urni diskurz med svojim podpornikom Grahamom in dejanskim arheologom Flintom? Seveda nisi, ker te znanost ne zanima, tako kot nobenega intelektualno omejenega/lenega teoretika zarot ne.
Graham Hancock je sposoben zgolj jecljanja, ko se sooči z dejanskim znanstvenikom, ki za malo malico demantira njegove za lase privlečene teorije, pravljične štorije. Nobenih temeljnih dokazov o vesoljnem potopu napredne civilizacij ne poda, ker je prodajalec megle, od česar zelo lepo živi, tudi s svojim sinom, s katerim prodajata meglo na Netflixu in služita lepe denarčke. Rogan pa je njegov frendič.
Matias, dokazi so, a skrbno skriti ali uničeni. Zakaj so prikrivali, pa sem opisala v moji temi o potovanju skozi čas.
Grenivka, si gledala 4-urni diskurz med svojim podpornikom Grahamom in dejanskim arheologom Flintom? Seveda nisi, ker te znanost ne zanima, tako kot nobenega intelektualno omejenega/lenega teoretika zarot ne.
Graham Hancock je sposoben zgolj jecljanja, ko se sooči z dejanskim znanstvenikom, ki za malo malico demantira njegove za lase privlečene teorije, pravljične štorije. Nobenih temeljnih dokazov o vesoljnem potopu napredne civilizacij ne poda, ker je prodajalec megle, od česar zelo lepo živi, tudi s svojim sinom, s katerim prodajata meglo na Netflixu in služita lepe denarčke. Rogan pa je njegov frendič.
1
Odgovor lahko oddate kot gost. Vgrajena je časovna omejitev 30 sekund za oddajo novega sporočila.
Opozorilo: po 297. členu
Kazenskega zakonika je vsak posameznik kazensko odgovoren za javno spodbujanje sovraštva, nasilja ali nestrpnosti.
30.10.2025 ob 23:10
Prevertite filmček na 6:00 in ga ustavite.
Oglejte si Srednjeoceanski hrbet in druge podobne podvodne strukture, ki lepo potrjujejo, verske tekste Zemlje da se je zemeljski plašč (raz)počil (kot je lepo vidno iz podvodnega reliefa) se privzdignil in iz katerih razpok je na površje privrela voda, ki se ne nekoč nahajala pod vrhno plastjo zemeljskega plašča. To je tudi razlog, da kadarkoli vrtajo v večje globine Zemlje vedno najdejo velike žepe ujete vode, ki načeloma tam ne bi smela biti.
Tako kot piše v Svetem Pismu, da je ob stvarjenju Bog ustvaril vode pod Zemljo, katere večji del je zdaj na površju.
Pred potopom je bila Zemlja popolnoma drugačna. Bistveno bolj zelena, z večjim zračnim tlakom, večjim deležem kisika, kar je povzročilo bolj bujno vegetacijo. Prav tako so bile manjše razlike v klimi med ekvatorjem in poli.
Vodna para ki je bila nad obokom je ščitila živa bitja pred gama sevanji in je skupaj s prej omenjenim podaljšala življensko dobo ljudi. Tako so lobanje neandertalskih ljudi zgolj lobanje zelo starih ljudi, ker določene kosti v lobanji rastejo tudi še ko ostale kosti več ne rastejo. To je znanstveno dejstvo, ki jo poznajo vsi ortodonti. Plazilci, ki rastejo celo življenje so zato ob večji življenski dobi bili večji. Zmaji, ki so jih poznali še pred nekaj stoletji so takrat lahko zrasli v dinozavre, ki seveda niso živeli milijone let nazaj kar kažejo arheološka odkritja katere na vse pretege skrivajo. Od človeške stopinje v stopinji dinozavra, ohranjeno mehko tkivo dinozavrov, da o še živečih pterodaktilih in pleziozavrov in raznih sauropodov o katerih so v najbolj odkročnih delih sveta poročali še v prejšnjem stoletju. Če koga zanima mu lahko priporočim na tisoče primerov očevidcev iz Kameruna, Gabona, Konga, Liberije, Papue, ZDA plus nešteto kipcev, poslikav, ljudi. Celo v 1100 let staremu templju v Kambodži Angkor vat imate vgraviranega stegozavra.
Seveda o tem ni dovoljeno pisat ker je v nasprotju s teorijo evolucije ki je sveta krava laži arheologije in zamolčane prazgodovine.
Oče zgodovine Herodotus v svojih knjigi podrobno opisuje Pterodaktile v Arabiji in Egiptu, razne Sauropode Afrike, ki pa jih prevajalci pojasnjujejo, da gre za razne slone, nosoroge a da je opis povsem zgrešen ker naj bi Herodotus teh živali ne videl, čeprav jih je tako podrobno opisal. Tudi slavni Flavius Josephus (Jožef Flavij) omenja ta leteča bitja, ki sem jih prej omenjal. Dva ujeta pterodaktila s strani lovcov sta celo zašla v izdajo časopisov v ZDA v 19. st. saj imata premer kril iz slike sodeč okoli 10m. Itak pa to žival pod različnimi imeni poznajo v mnogih državah sveta.
Mar na govori o zmajih celo Sveto Pismo v Grškem dodatku Daniela?
Mar pod besedo Behemot ne opisuje dinozavra? Uradni razlagalci pravijo, da gre za nilskega konja. Ima morda nilski konj rep kot cedra? Seveda ne. Dinozaver pa.
Pa da se vrnem k osnovni temi...
Vesoljni potop je razlaga za goro lukenj v geologiji. Kaj počnejo človeški predmeti v kameninah starih desetine milijonov let? Zakaj ni sledov erozije med plastmi? Zakaj praktično nikjer na svetu sloji niso tako kot v učbenikih. Če manjka sloj, mar potem manjka čas? Le kako lahko dobimo fosile meduz? Od kje takšne količine fosilnih goriv? Danes ne nastajajo, v naravnih katastrofah tudi ne. Pod nami je več zakopanega materiala živalstva in rastlinstva kot na svetu sploh obstaja. Sledovi potopa so povsod. Kamorkoli pogledate. Cela Ljubljanska kotlina je polna rečnih kamnov. Kakšna kataklizma ga je nanesla? Katera reka je oblikovala Čepovansko dolino, če tam ni niti potoka?
Mar je luna živ odraz eksplozije v času pred potopom s vojimi kraterji, ki izvirajo iz Zemlje?
Zakaj bi knige kot so Biblija, Knjiga jubilejev, Henohova knjiga, dela Jožefa Flavija potrjevala, da so ljudje pred potopom živeli 900 let? Če bi bila to propagandna knjiga, kjer neumen bi v propagandno knjigo dal nekaj tako odštekanega? Hm, torej je morda res... Seveda je... To je najbrž tudi razlog, zakaj 90% človeških možganov ne uporabimo... ker pač 90% časa manj živimo. To je morda tudi razlog zakaj se nam tretji zobje ne zrastejo, ker zadnjič sem na nekem portalu bral, da človek ima gene za 3 zobe.
Zakaj poznamo na tisoče različnih zgodb iz vseh predelčkov sveta vseh starih civilizacijah o potopu in 8 rešenih ljudeh? Zakaj zgodovinar Jožef Flavij v svoji knjigi piše, da so ostanki ladje še vedno lepo vidni in ljudstvo nosi delčke lesa, v spomin v dolino? Mar veste da so ostanki pod ledom na eni od ram Ararata še vedno vidni? Še koordinate bi vam lahko dal. Mar veste, da so bile mere ladje idealne za borbo pred valovi? (Fizika pač) Mar veste, da bi bilo na ladjo potrebno vzeti le več tisoč živali, da bi imeli vse živali kot jih poznamo danes, saj mikroevolucija naredi svoje, makroevolucija je pa laž? Mar veste da je Nimrod celo svojo tiranijo zgradil na strahu prebivalcev, da bi se poplava vrnila in je zato uspel graditi tako visok Babilonski stolp? Mar sploh veste zakaj je bila poplava nujna? Mar veste kakšne norosti so se dogajale pred tem, pa tudi še po tem kar vam arheologi zamolčijo čeprav mnogi vedo?
Mar veste da so našli školjke na Mont Everestu? Mar znajo hodit tako visoko ali pa je bil nekoč vesoljni potop?
Mar veste, da se da premog, dimante, kapnike ustvariti v zelo kratkem času in milijoni let niso potrebni?
Mar veste, da naj bi imeli kometi življensko dobo 10 000 let? Kako to da jih še vidimo? Izmisliti so si morali Oortov oblak. Mar veste, da se Luna Oddaljuje od Zemlje. Če zavrtimo čas nazaj bi se milijone let nazaj Zemlje dotikala? Ne gre to. Ampak kaj bi vam vse to pisal, ko pa je vse v knjigah, vse na Wikipediji, internetu, dokumentarcih...
Kdor misli, da je resnica podarjena (vsaj pri pomembnih temah) se zgladko moti.
Zgodovina je zelo kontaminirana ker ne upošteva ozadij, skrivnih združb in ker "sovražnik" skriva pravo človeško zgodovino. Če bi jo poznali bi se obrnili k stvarniku, tako pa smo bolj na poti k uničenju.
Geologija je zelo kontaminirana.
Farmacija je zelo kontaminirana.
Verske institucije so zelo kontaminirane. Resnična religija še najbolj.
Fizika in astronomija sta delno kontaminirani.
Jaz pravim, znanost je takrat ko ta sledi dokazom, najdbam. Ko morajo najdbe slediti dogmi to ni več znanost. Ko se najde uničuje, skriva, ignorira to ni več znanost. In prav to se nam zelo dogaja.
Zakaj so pri vseh stvareh dovoljene različna mnenja, različne razlage, različni pogledi.
Zakaj pri teh vprašanjih oz. teorije evolucije in prazgodovine ni tako?
Zakaj se zgodba izpričana v vseh starih zapisih, podprta z dokazi v arheologiji popolnoma ignorira?
Mar ni na sodišču prav, da se da besedo vsaj dvema različnima stranema?
Nešteto evolucionističnih znanstvenikov prestopa na drugo stran a tam ostajajo tisti, ki jim je dobra plača in služba bolj pomembna od resnice. Religija evolucija je religija z največjo podporo davkoplačevalskega denarja. Uči, da je brez razloga nič ustvaril vse in je ta nič naredil vse tako izjemno. Človek je nastal iz skale, tako da ko hodite po kamnolomu hodite po svojih prednikih. Mar se sploh zavedate, da je ena človeška celica bolj kompleksna od vesoljske rakete?
Torej po vaše knjiga se ne more narediti sama kot rezultat vetra, dežja, kamna, sonca in drugih slučajev, milijonkrat bolj kompleksen dnk, celica, planet, fizikalni zakoni, duša pa lahko? Zelo znanstveno...
Zanima me kdo je ustvaril dušo? Vprašajte začasno mrtve kako po smrti vidijo bolje, slišijo bolje, čutijo bolje, telepatsko se sporazumevajo... v drugi nam nevidni dimenziji. Kako je evolucija ustvarila to?
No ampak saj vse to je samo butasta teorija zarotea ne. Pa naj bo.