☕ Zakaj se zmerni muslimani ne odrečejo muslimanski veri? - 2

*

Micka po googlu jih je obsojala do marca 2016, potem pa nehala. Vse osebe brez dokumentov in Micko bi bilo treba poslati v Sirijo, pa bi lahko vsaj ukrepali normalno.

Ne, nimam ga. zakaj?

Zaljubljena je v muslimane, pa ne more verjeti, da ti nisi.

Jaz tega ne razumem tako... Že prvi stavek ne govori o večini Slovencev, ampak o večini muslimanske skupnosti. Torej, nek določen procent neke skupnosti, ki je spet samo en določen procent celotne Slovenije.

Yara je zaljubljena v katolika, zato pa piše take

*

Seveda. Islamokomunisti pa v jok.

. 🙂

Micka očitno preveč posluš papeža Frančiška, ki ni na realnih tleh. Tako ali tako bi morali prepovedati vse vere, kot je bilo v komunizmu.

Mi ta citat ni pa ni dal miru, sem še razmišljala o njem... V bistvu je popolnoma logično, če ne zakompliciraš...:P

"slovenskih državljanov, ki bodo čez, recimo, 20 let večina muslimanske oziroma islamske skupnosti v Sloveniji."
Slovenski državljani bodo čez 20 let večina muslimanske skupnosti. Zdaj je večina muslimanske skupnosti druge narodnosti ali pa so vsaj rojeni kjerkoli drugje kot v Sloveniji, čez 20 let (ko jih bo veliko tistih prej omenjenih umrlo), bodo pa večino muslimanske skupnosti predstavljalo državljani Slovenije-ti muslimani, ki so se rodili muslimanom na slovenskih tleh.
Ne pa večina Slovencev bo muslimanov. Razlika!

ma dej nehi, vsi imajo slovensko državljanstvo, saj smo jih ja delili kot konfete

*

V slovenski porodnišnici se jih pa res deli kot konfete.

*

Delaš za plačo. Ko dela zmanjka, te odpustijo in odpeketaš domov.
V multikulti retardirnici, pa je seveda drugače.

*

Potomci teh, ki jih niso poslali domov po končanem delu, danes ubijajo nedolžne civiliste po Evropi.

"... s slovensko identiteto in so muslimani. " Kaj vse si bo še namislil. Tole dvoje enostavno ne gre skupaj.

https://scontent.flju2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/18921894_181649405698162_4242622094359428615_n.jpg?oh=92eee215d1e7d901d1e9799e0b7fa2b1&oe=59A38E95

Historians generally avoid comparing religious death tolls, as doing so requires attributing complex geopolitical and colonial conflicts to faith alone.

However, academic estimates suggest Christianity (including Catholicism) has historically resulted in a higher total death toll.

This is primarily because of its longer historical timeline, a substantially larger global population over two millennia, and the devastating impact of European colonialism, which was frequently intertwined with Catholic expansionism in the Americas.

When evaluating these histories, the data highlights specific contexts for violence and the difficulty in quantifying these deaths:

Colonialism and Conversions:
Historians estimate that the European conquests of the Americas, driven heavily by Catholic powers like Spain and Portugal, resulted in the deaths of millions of Indigenous peoples. Many died from introduced diseases, but massive numbers also died from enslavement, forced labor, and direct military slaughter.

Medieval and Early Modern Violence:
Both religions expanded through military conquest. The Christian Crusades (11th to 13th centuries) are estimated to have caused between 2,000,000 to 6,000,000 casualties, while the Spanish Inquisition led to the torture, exile, or execution of tens of thousands of suspected heretics, Jews, and Muslims. Meanwhile, the early expansion of the Islamic Caliphates (7th to 15th centuries) resulted in major conquests across the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia.

The "Encyclopedia of Wars" Context:
According to The Encyclopedia of Wars by Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod, religion-specific conflicts make up only about 7% of all recorded human wars. Of those, the authors attribute roughly 3.75% to Islamic conflicts and smaller percentages to various Christian conflicts.

Secular vs. Religious Violence:
Massive historical death tolls are typically the result of secular, political, or ideological regimes rather than purely religious wars. The 20th century alone saw tens of millions of deaths under atheistic, totalitarian regimes and through two World Wars, which far outstrip historical religious conflict figures.

Ultimately, attributing historical atrocities solely to the religious identity of the actors obscures the complex economic, political, and cultural motivations behind these events.